马克龙会见高市早苗 互发“龟派气功”网疯传
(东京2日讯)法国总统马克龙近日到东京进行国是访问,与日本首相高市早苗同台开记者会,两人在会后突然玩心大起,转身面对彼此、双手合十摆出“龟派气功”动作,反差互动立刻在网路引爆讨论,也成为此次访问的意外亮点。综合法新社与印度媒体报导,马克龙此行与高市早苗就核能发展、人工智慧应用以及印太安全进行密集会谈,双方展现高度默契。
记者会整体气氛严肃中带著友好,直到最后一刻,两位领袖才用幽默方式替场合画下句点。
两人模仿的“龟派气功”来自日本人气作品《七龙珠》,剧中角色会先凝聚能量,再由双手释放强烈光波,这个招牌动作在全球都有粉丝。
高市早苗笑说,日法的关系不只建立在经贸与防卫,也连结于想像力,文化软实力往往能拉近彼此距离。
实际上,马克龙曾公开展现过他对《七龙珠》的喜爱,日本漫画家鸟山明辞世时,他曾在X平台分享对方的签名画作悼念,足见这次互动并非临时起意。其实高市早苗一向擅长运用动漫外交,过去会见意大利总理梅洛尼时,还特别准备“凯蒂猫”(Hello Kitty)玻璃杯作为礼物。
Thursday, April 2, 2026
马克龙会见高市早苗 互发“龟派气功”网疯传
中共“平行宇宙式”视频震惊世界:“伊朗摧毁27个美军基地 川普战败” “伊朗都快反攻到白宫了”
4月1日,X平台两则帖文引发热议,将复旦大学中国研究院院长、被称为“中共国师”的张维为一段视频演讲与现实地缘政治对比,掀起“平行宇宙式宣传”讨论。视频中,张维为谈及伊朗战争,称伊朗“一举摧毁27个美军基地”,连美国总统川普都被“打得鼻青脸肿”,并称中东国家斥巨资建设的美军基地“买了个寂寞”,一旦出事美军出事会“带头开溜”。这段约55秒内容被指为典型“主旋律叙事”。张维为之所以被称“国师”,源于2021年5月31日中共中央政治局第三十次集体学习,他受邀向习近平及政治局委员讲解“国际传播能力建设”。
X用户墓碑科技率先转发并评论说:“这种震撼全球的军事大捷到底在哪发生?在中共国学者嘴里。”并指出其本质是以“平行宇宙剧本”恐吓台湾,批评当前专家为迎合主旋律已放弃基本逻辑,只靠“精神胜利法”解读国际局势,并讽刺台湾人“看不懂这种低级笑话”,而现实中美军航母战斗群仍在印太巡航,战斧导弹射程“不参考阿Q日记”。该帖获超4.3万浏览、245点赞,引发大量嘲讽如“阿Q中央电视台”“宠物狗博主”。
“张维为这家伙给习近平挖坑!习近平如果把张维为聘为军师,张维为肯定鼓动习近平直接把美国从地球上抹掉!”这一针见血的点评,将张维为的言论与高层决策风险直接挂钩,暗示此类“专家”建议可能误导决策层走向极端对抗。两帖联动后,网络舆论迅速发酵。不少网友留言指出,张维为的说法已脱离现实,纯属“睁眼说瞎话”“厚着脸皮扯谎”,并担忧这类宣传会进一步加剧国内信息环境的封闭。
部分评论甚至联想到历史上的“精神胜利法”,嘲笑“伊朗都快反攻到白宫了”。
墓碑科技碑/伊朗一举摧毁了27个美军基地。就连特朗普也败下阵来。那么,这场震惊世界的军事胜利究竟发生在哪里呢?答案是:中共国家学者的口中。视频中的教授正在大谈海湾局势。他断言,中东国家花费巨资建造美军基地,最终却只换来一片荒芜。他甚至信誓旦旦地保证,一旦出现任何动乱,美军都会立即撤离。兜兜转转这么久,这套高谈阔论的真正目标其实是东南亚。他试图用一套来自平行宇宙的虚构说辞来恐吓台湾。过去的那些代言人至少还能保持一丝逻辑一致性。而如今的专家们,为了迎合党的路线,只会用“精神胜利”来撰写地缘政治分析。海峡对岸的台湾民众根本无法理解这种低俗的笑话。美国航母打击群继续在印太海域进行例行巡逻。战斧导弹的射程从来不需要查阅阿Q的日记。
特朗普拟祭200%药品关税 未达协议药厂成目标

特朗普拟祭200%药品关税 未达协议药厂成目标
(华盛顿2日讯)美国总统特朗普为落实药价改革,打算准备对未达成“低价保证协议”的药厂祭出关税大刀。
根据知情人士透露,特朗普政府最快将于今日4月2日(周四)宣布,引用《贸易扩张法》(Trade Expansion Act)第232条,以国家安全为由对进口药品课征高额关税。
特朗普在过去一年内多次公开威胁,将对制药产业课征100%至200%的惩罚性关税,目的就是要强迫各大药厂将生产线移回美国境内,并实质降低美国患者负担的药价。
目前包含辉瑞(Pfizer)与礼来(Eli Lilly)在内的多数龙头药厂,都已经与白宫达成共识并签署协议,成功换取为期三年的关税豁免权。
这次关税计划的核心源自于第232条调查,旨在评估药品进口对国家安全的影响。根据《彭博社》报道,有消息指出,凡是目前尚未与政府达成协议,且完全没有进行相关谈判意愿的公司,未来将直接面临100%的重税。
特朗普希望借此重塑美国药品供应链,确保关键药物不再过度依赖海外进口。
不过也有知情人士提醒,相关执行细节尚未完全定案,未来仍有变动可能。为了避免伤及病患权益,政府针对特定药物或罕见疾病类别,可能会另外设定豁免条款。
最高领袖仍在伊朗不敢公开露面 害怕美国中情局、以色列摩萨德追殺
最高领袖仍在伊朗不敢公开露面 害怕美国中情局、以色列摩萨德追殺
(德黑兰1日讯)伊朗新任最高领袖穆杰塔巴至今迟未公开亮相,一度传出已赴俄罗斯接受治疗的消息。
但俄罗斯驻伊朗大使星期二表明,穆杰塔巴目前人还在伊朗境内,但基于“可以理解的原因”而暂时避免公开露面。
综合外媒报道,俄罗斯驻德黑兰大使杰多夫向全球俄语媒体RTVI表示:“正如伊朗领导层一再声明,新领袖目前身在伊朗,但基于可以理解的原因,他暂时避免公开露面。”
穆杰塔巴是伊朗已故最高领袖哈梅内伊之子,他的父亲在2月28日美国与以色列联军发动空袭时丧命。他在本月初获命为新任最高领袖,但至今未公开露面,伊朗官媒仅刊登一些据称是由其发表的书面声明。
此举引发外界对穆杰塔巴的健康状况和下落的强烈揣测,并质疑他在多大程度上能控制伊朗政府和军队。
美国政府表示,他们认为穆杰塔巴身负重伤,甚至可能毁容;更有传言称,穆杰塔巴正在俄罗斯接受治疗,但遭伊朗驻莫斯科大使否认。俄罗斯和伊朗保持着密切的外交关系,双边去年曾签署战略伙伴关系条约。而莫斯科针对穆杰塔巴身在伊朗一事发表声明,凸显尽管伊朗领导层局势不明,俄罗斯仍持续与德黑兰保持接触。
由于穆杰塔巴至今仍未公开露面,有报道称,美国中情局(CIA)、以色列摩萨德等情报机构正持续追踪这位最高领袖的下落。
美国国防部长赫格塞斯星期二在记者会上表示,美国正密切关注俄罗斯在美伊冲突中的角色。尽管莫斯科方面否认有关协助伊朗的报道,但赫格塞斯表示:“我们清楚知道俄罗斯和中国正在对伊朗采取什么行动。我们正在加以应对。”
特朗普证实伊朗总统求停火 强硬回应:不开放霍峡就再轰伊朗“回到石器时代”
![]()
特朗普证实伊朗总统求停火 强硬回应:不开放霍峡就再轰伊朗“回到石器时代”
(华盛顿1日讯)中东战局出现转折,美国总统特朗普4月1日证实,伊朗新任总统佩泽希齐扬(Masoud Pezeshkian)已正式向美方提出“停火请求”。特朗普对这位新领导人给出了出人意料的评价,称其比前任“聪明且不激进”,但也强硬要求,除非霍尔木兹海峡全面恢复自由通航,否则美军将持续猛烈轰炸,直言要让伊朗“回到石器时代”。
特朗普在“真实社交”(Truth Social)的最新声明中,对佩泽希齐扬给予了正面评价。他认为佩泽希齐扬与以往的激进派领导人截然不同,具备更高的智慧且立场相对温和。
然而,特朗普也指出,由于无法承受美军的持续攻势,佩泽希齐扬已正式向白宫递出停火橄榄枝。这印证了自2月底开战以来,伊朗政府在承受巨大伤亡与损失后,急需喘息空间以维持国家存续。 对于伊朗的求和,特朗普明确表示,美方目前仅处于“考虑”阶段。他开出的唯一先决条件是,影响全球石油命脉的霍尔木兹海峡必须达到“完全开放、自由且清空”的状态。
在声明末尾,特朗普再次发出威胁,称若伊朗不配合上述条件,美军将继续发动毁灭性打击,直到对方国力倒退回“石器时代”。
阿联酋禁伊朗公民入境或转机

阿联酋禁伊朗公民入境或转机
(迪拜1日讯)中东局势持续紧张之际,阿联酋对入境与转机政策作出调整,伊朗公民即日起被禁止进入该国或经当地转机,区域航班安排随之受到影响。阿联酋航空、伊蒂哈德航空及迪拜航空已同步在官网发布相关通知,明确说明伊朗公民将无法入境或使用阿联酋作为中转枢纽。此举被视为在当前局势下加强边境管控的重要一步。
尽管相关措施已由航空公司对外公布,但阿联酋官方尚未就此发表正式说明。
分析认为,在中东冲突不断升温的背景下,各国对人员流动的限制将趋于常态化,航空与跨境出行的不确定性亦随之上升。
Wednesday, April 1, 2026
Strait of Hormuz shutdown: What implications for Europe ?
Strait of Hormuz shutdown: What implications for Europe?
Military strikes by the United States and Israel against Iran in a joint effort — followed by retaliatory attacks from Tehran on Gulf energy infrastructure — have triggered a major escalation in tensions, culminating in the almost total closure of the Strait of Hormuz.
The waterway is one of the world’s most critical energy chokepoints, handling roughly a quarter to a third of global oil shipments and around a fifth of liquefied natural gas (LNG).
Its closure has sent shockwaves through global markets. The EU estimates gas prices have risen 70% and oil by 50% resulting in an extra €13 billion bill on fossil fuel imports.
On 30 March, leaders of the G7 — Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States — said they stand ready to take “any necessary measures” to safeguard energy stability and global supply.
European energy ministers are meeting today to assess supply risks and consider emergency measures to curb demand, according to a letter seen by Euronews.
What has been the immediate impact of the Hormuz crisis?
The most immediate effect has been a sharp rise in energy prices; driven by a sudden supply shortfall and uncertainty over how long disruptions will last.
Iran’s strikes on 18 March reportedly damaged between 30% and 40% of Gulf oil refining capacity, removing an estimated 11 million barrels per day from global supply.
This has pushed Brent crude prices to around $119 per barrel, up from roughly $70 before the conflict started. Analysts warn prices could rise significantly further under worst-case scenarios, drawing parallels to the 1970s oil crisis.
Natural gas prices are also climbing, with fears they could return to levels seen during the 2022 energy crisis following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
How exposed is Europe to the war in the Middle East?
The European Union’s direct reliance on Middle Eastern crude oil remains relatively limited — about 8% of imports came from Saudi Arabia in 2024.
However, the bloc is more dependent on refined fuels such as diesel and jet fuel from countries including Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, leaving it vulnerable to refinery disruptions.
At the same time, LNG shipments originally bound for Europe are being diverted to Asia, where buyers are willing to pay higher prices.
How long could disruptions last?
The damage to Gulf energy infrastructure is significant.
Analysts estimate that restarting shut-down facilities could take several months, while fully rebuilding damaged sites may take up to three years.
Even if hostilities were to end quickly, European leaders warn that the economic and energy impacts could linger for some time, feeding into inflation and industrial costs.
What measures are being taken to ease prices?
The International Energy Agency coordinated the release of 400 million barrels of oil on 11 March in an effort to stabilise markets, though this has so far proved insufficient.
Saudi Arabia is attempting to boost exports via alternative routes, including the Yanbu pipeline to the Red Sea, which is now operating near capacity.
Diplomatic efforts are also ongoing, with countries such as Pakistan and Turkey acting as intermediaries between Washington and Tehran — but with limited progress so far.
What are the risks?
One major flashpoint is Iran’s Kharg Island, which accounts for around 90% of the country’s crude exports.
Although recent US strikes targeted the site, the energy infrastructure there was spared. Iran has since warned it could retaliate by targeting desalination plants in the Gulf — a move that could threaten water supplies for millions and deepen the crisis.
What contingency measures are set for the EU?
The EU maintains emergency oil reserves equivalent to at least 90 days of consumption, with total European stockpiles estimated at around 100 million tonnes.
Gas storage rules typically require reserves to be filled to 90% by November, though these requirements have been relaxed to 75% to avoid panic buying.
Why is this crisis particularly challenging for Europe?
The energy shock comes at a difficult time for Europe’s economy.
Before the conflict, EU countries were already grappling with high energy costs and declining industrial competitiveness. Energy-intensive sectors such as steel, chemicals and cement have been calling for urgent support.
The current crisis risks further price spikes and potential fuel shortages, exposing underlying vulnerabilities in the bloc’s energy system.
How are individual EU countries responding?
Governments are taking a range of measures to cushion the impact.
Italy is seeking increased gas supplies from Algeria, while Belgium’s transmission operator Fluxys is exploring alternative LNG sources, including the United States and Nigeria.
At the same time, EU countries are rolling out tax cuts, subsidies and market interventions to shield consumers and businesses.
Some are going further: Slovenia has introduced fuel rationing, while Austria has cut fuel taxes and imposed limits on retailer profit margins.
EU finance ministers are also considering broader measures, including oil price caps and windfall taxes on energy companies.