Thursday, April 9, 2026

Ukrainaian Unmanned Systems Forces struck the Admiral Grigorovich frigate

 

In Novorossiysk, Unmanned Systems Forces struck the Admiral Grigorovich frigate, carrying Kalibr missiles

In Novorossiysk, Unmanned Systems Forces struck the Admiral Grigorovich frigate, carrying Kalibr missiles


The Unmanned Systems Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine struck the Admiral Grigorovich frigate in the port of Novorossiysk.

According to Ukrinform, Robert “Magyar” Brovdi, commander of the Unmanned Systems Forces, reported this on Telegram.

He stated that “on the night of April 6, the USF ‘birds’ struck the frigate Admiral Grigorovich in the port of Novorossiysk and delivered some blessed fire to the Sivash drilling rig.”

Ukraine Hits Russian Kalibr Missile Warship Admiral Grigorovich in Port  Strike, Video — UNITED24 MediaThe Admiral Grigorovich is the first military frigate of the Russian Navy’s Burevestnik project, equipped with Kalibr cruise missiles (8 missiles) and the Shtil-1 air defense missile system (24 missiles).

“The air defense missile launches were carried out directly from the frigate’s deck while approaching the target, which did not prevent us from pecking at the floating scab,” Brovdi emphasized.

The operation was carried out by the birds [drones] of the 1st Separate Center of the Unmanned Systems Forces; it was planned and coordinated by the Security Service of Ukraine. The extent of the damage is being assessed by intelligence.

The Sivash floating drilling rig was targeted by the birds of the 413th Raid Separate Battalion in cooperation with the deep-strike forces of the Ukrainian Navy, Brovdi noted.

As reported by Ukrinform, units of the Unmanned Systems Forces struck two radar stations, a Tor anti-aircraft missile system, and a Russian anti-aircraft gun in the temporarily occupied Crimea and in the temporarily occupied territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions.

Poland’s economy 42% larger thanks to EU membership

 POLAND STRONG | STRAJK KOBIET | POLAND WOMEN PROTEST" Scarf for Sale by  MagicBoutique | Redbubble

Poland’s economy 42% larger thanks to EU membership

Poland’s economy is 42% larger than it would be if the country had not joined the European Union, according to new analysis by the Polish Economic Institute (PIE), a public think tank.

Its figures come amid growing political debate in Poland about the possibility of leaving the EU. So-called “Polexit” seemed unthinkable until recently, but now has the support of up to a quarter of society in some polls.

In its analysis, PIE ran a series of calculations using around 400 models of a “hypothetical Poland” that did or did not join the EU in 2004, looking at how its economy, measured in real GDP per capita in constant US dollar terms, would have developed up to 2024 in various scenarios.

In all cases, Poland benefited by joining, with a worst-case estimate that its economy was 22% larger thanks to being in the EU and a best-case scenario of 61%. The average gain was 42%.

The findings show that “our estimate of the gains from joining the EU is not statistical noise resulting from the inclusion of a particular variable, but rather a systematic effect”, write PIE’s analysts.

They say that Poland’s economic gains from EU membership “stem largely from the benefits of joining the European single market, which facilitated trade, international investment, and improvements in institutional quality”.


PIE published similar findings in 2024, when Poland was marking the 20th anniversary of accession to the EU. It found that Poland’s GDP per capita in terms of purchasing power parity (PPP) was 40% higher in 2022 than if it had not joined the bloc.

However, their latest analysis did not use PPP, which takes into account differences in the cost of living in each country, as PIE’s economists felt that using real GDP in constant dollar terms “better captures Poland’s international economic strength”.

In those terms, Poland’s GDP was last year estimated to have surpassed $1 trillion for the first time. PIE notes, however, that the estimated economic gains for Poland from EU membership are similar whether calculated with or without PPP.

Despite evidence of the positive impact of EU membership on Poland’s economy, there has recently been growing talk of a potential “Polexit” from the bloc.

In December, an opinion poll indicated that 25% of Poles support leaving the EU, with 66% opposed to the idea. Among supporters of the right-wing and far-right opposition, 43% favoured Polexit while 44% were against it.

Another poll published last month by state pollster CBOS found that 60% of Poles believe EU membership brings more benefits and costs, while 21% hold the opposite view.

The current pro-EU government, led by former European Council President Donald Tusk, has accused the opposition of pushing Poland towards the EU exit door.

“Polexit is a real threat today,” wrote Tusk last month. “It would be a catastrophe for Poland. I will do everything to stop them.”

However, the national-conservative Law and Justice (PiS), which is the largest opposition party, has insisted that it wants to reform, not leave, the EU. It says it wants the bloc to return to a focus on trade and to stop interfering in issues such as climate, migration and social policy.

The far-right Confederation (Konfederacja), which is the other main opposition group, is even more eurosceptic, though has not openly called for Polexit. The radical-right Confederation of the Polish Crown (KKP), which has seen growing support in polls, supports leaving the EU.

Poland has been one of Europe’s fastest-growing economies in recent decades. It was the only EU member state to avoid recession during the 2007-2009 global financial crisis and remained among the stronger performers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

In 2025, Poland recorded GDP growth of 3.6%, the fourth-highest rate in the EU, behind Ireland (12.3%), Malta (4.0%) and Cyprus (3.8%), according to Eurostat. Ireland’s growth figure, however, is widely seen as distorted by the activities of multinational companies, while Malta and Cyprus both have relatively small economies.

Recent data from Eurostat also show that Poland has steadily narrowed the wealth gap with the rest of the EU, reaching 81% of the EU average GDP per capita (adjusted for cost of living) in 2025, the closest it has ever been.

As a relatively poorer member state, Poland has also been a large recipient of EU funds. Between 2004 and 2024, it received a net total of around €160 billion in EU funds, more than any other member state. However, in per capita terms, it has is behind countries such as Hungary and the Baltic states.

Top 10 Countries With the Most U.S. Troops in 2025

Aviation - Aircraft are being ready to fly to IRAN : US Military Aircraft - Stealth Bombers, Fighters & Attack Jets…🇺🇸 | Facebook
Ranked: Top 10 Countries With the Most U.S. Troops in 2025 

 Visual showing top 10 countries by U.S. troop presence around the world, using data from the Department of Justice.

Key Takeaways

  • Japan and Germany host the largest amounts of U.S. troops presence with 61.7k and 49.3k personnel respectively.
  • The top 10 host countries account for roughly 200k U.S. military and civilian personnel.
  • U.S. deployments remain concentrated in regions tied to Russia and China security priorities.

The global footprint of U.S. troops remains extensive. The data shows a small group of strategic host countries concentrate most deployments.

This visualization, created in partnership with Inigo, provides visual context to where U.S. forces are stationed and how that footprint reflects shifting geopolitical priorities. These placements highlight enduring alliances and evolving security concerns.

Where Are U.S. Troops Deployed?

Japan hosts the largest U.S. presence with 61.7k personnel. Germany follows with 49.3k. South Korea ranks third at 26.7k.

CountryTotal Military & Civilian Personnel (2025)
🇯🇵 Japan61,684
🇩🇪 Germany49,338
🇰🇷 South Korea26,722
🇮🇹 Italy15,365
🇬🇧 United Kingdom11,592
🇪🇸 Spain4,331
🇧🇭 Bahrain3,813
🇧🇪 Belgium1,832
🇹🇷 Turkey1,728
🇨🇺 Cuba771

Italy and the United Kingdom host 15.4k and 11.6k personnel respectively. These locations form the backbone of U.S. military positioning in Europe.

This distribution is not new. U.S. troop levels across these top host countries have hovered around 200k for the past decade. The consistency reflects long standing defense agreements and established infrastructure.

Strategic Priorities Shape Deployment

Beyond the top hosts, smaller but strategic deployments remain important. Spain has 4.3k personnel. Bahrain has 3.8k. Turkey hosts 1.8k. Cuba rounds out the top 10 with 0.8k.

These placements support key operational hubs and regional missions. Many are tied to naval access, logistics, and rapid response capabilities.

Overall, deployments align closely with major security priorities. Forces are concentrated in regions linked to Russia and China. This reflects a continued focus on deterrence and alliance support in critical theaters.

A Persistent Global Footprint

The U.S. military presence abroad remains highly concentrated and strategically aligned. Japan and Germany anchor this network, while other host countries support regional operations.

The data shows stability in overall troop levels. It also highlights how geography continues to shape military strategy. As global tensions evolve, this footprint is likely to remain a key tool of U.S. power projection.

白宫酝酿实质 撤出或重新部署部分驻西班牙和德国美军

 WSJ:特朗普政府考虑撤走部份美军欧洲部署以惩罚北约盟友

 北约秘书长吕特(Mark Rutte)8日赴白宫与美国总统川普进行闭门会谈,会谈气氛被形容为“坦诚且开放”(frank and open),但实质上充满紧张。白宫明确表示,川普对北约在伊朗战事中的“缺席”极度不满,正认真考虑对北约进行“实质性调整”,包括可能从西班牙和德国撤出或重新部署部分美军驻军

美国被曝将从部分北约国家撤出军事部署,因其未能对美以提供帮助,欧洲局势可能如何变化?北约有解体风险吗? - 知乎 

 会谈背景:北约“没通过考验”白宫新闻秘书卡罗琳·莱维特(Karoline Leavitt)在会前记者会上直言,川普认为北约盟国“被测试,但没通过考验”。过去数周,欧洲多国未积极响应美国呼吁,拒绝提供实质军事支援(如派兵护航霍尔木兹海峡、开放基地供美军使用),导致美国在对伊朗行动中感到“孤立”。川普在Truth Social上发文痛批:“北约在我们需要他们的时候不在场,以后也不会在。”吕特会后接受CNN访问时承认,川普“明显感到失望”,但他强调自己已向川普详细说明欧洲立场。会谈持续约两个半小时,未能完全缓解双方分歧。

惩罚性计划:针对“不合作”盟友据《华尔街日报》、Politico等媒体报导,白宫正在讨论一项惩罚性重置计划(punitive reset),核心包括:

将美军从被视为“不帮忙”的国家撤出或重新部署,转移至更支持美国的国家(如波兰、罗马尼亚、立陶宛、希腊)。

可能至少关闭一座欧洲美军基地,西班牙和德国是重点对象。

西班牙对美军划定“军事红线 ... 西班牙:北约中唯一未承诺将国防开支提高至GDP5%的国家,且曾限制美军使用其领空与基地。

驻德美军将大批撤离德国?德国:虽为美军重要枢纽,但德国高层公开批评美以对伊朗行动,令白宫不满。

这项计划目前仍处于“考虑中”阶段,并非立即执行,但已被视为川普施压欧洲增加防务开支与配合美国政策的强力筹码。完全退出北约则需国会批准,目前尚未启动正式程序。

国际反应与后续吕特此行被视为北约成立77年来最严峻的“危机公关”之一。欧洲盟国担忧跨大西洋关系出现不可逆裂痕,已有声音开始讨论“战略自主”与建立欧洲共同防务。巴基斯坦等斡旋方也呼吁各方在美伊临时停火期间保持克制。川普会后继续在社群媒体发文维持强硬立场,显示短期内北约内部紧张态势难以缓解。后续发展包括美伊伊斯兰堡谈判、北约内部协商,以及川普政府是否将威胁转为实际行动。此事件凸显伊朗战事已不仅限于中东,更深刻冲击全球安全架构。

西班牙、法国、意大利等北约国家都拒绝对美国战机开放领空。图为一架 B-52H“同温层堡垒”轰炸机从英国基地起飞,挂载12枚 AGM-158B JASSM-ER防区外巡航导弹。

美国总统多次呛声要退出北约,图为北约盟国领袖合影。

川普强调,北约此次未对美国提供帮助,未来也可能在美国需要的时候拒绝提供协助,随后又再次提起格陵兰问题。

 

北约秘书长吕特(左)8日前往华盛顿与美国总统川普会面,但却遭到川普指责未在伊朗战争过程中提供帮助。随后,白宫发言人莱维特表示,美国目前正在讨论“实质性退出北约”的具体步骤。



日本企业投资乌克兰制造无人机

Russia says it has summoned Japanese ambassador over Ukrainian drones - The  Japan Times 日本企业投资乌克兰制造无人机

俄罗斯外交部4月8日表示,鉴于日本一家初创企业向一家开发乌克兰拦截无人机的公司出资,已召见日本驻俄大使并提出抗议。

日本“泰拉无人机(Terra Drone)”在3月宣布,已向乌克兰企业“惊人无人机公司(Amazing Drones)”出资,该公司从事可在战场上快速投入使用的技术开发。

While discussions continue to rage over the “Ukrainian housewives” remark,  Japan's leading industrial drone provider is busy learning from their  experience. Japan's Terra Drone is entering the defense sector and  expanding its俄罗斯外交部发言人扎哈罗娃8日表示,已召见日本驻俄大使武藤显并提出抗议。据称俄方向武藤表示,这“属于明显损害俄罗斯安全保障利益的敌对行为”。

扎哈罗娃称,俄方主张高市政权持续采取非友好行为,并强调:“如果日本希望对话,就必须通过具体行动和务实措施来表明意愿。”

Japan's Terra Drone Enters Ukraine's Drone War With $3K Interceptors —  UNITED24 Media据日本驻俄罗斯大使馆称,武藤显8日在日方提议下与俄罗斯外交部副部长鲁登科举行会谈,就政治和经济等双边问题的解决进行了磋商。对于俄方就日本企业对乌企业投资提出的抗议,武藤方面进行了反驳。

俄罗斯总统府表示,由于日本方面的“非友好行为”,俄日关系已“下降到接近零的水平”。

俄罗斯政府近期加强了对高市政权“正在加速日本军事化”的指责,似乎也对日本企业接近乌克兰十分敏感。

“泰拉无人机(Terra Drone)”3月31日在基辅召开记者会,宣布对乌克兰企业投资,并开始销售拦截无人机。

“泰拉无人机(Terra Drone)”于2026年3月31日在乌克兰基辅召开了面向全球的记者会,就其在防务领域的相关举措进行了说明。“泰拉无人机(Terra Drone)”指出:安全保障环境正迎来重大转折期。尤其是在乌克兰战争中,低成本且可大规模运用的无人机左右着战局,极大改变了以往昂贵且数量有限的武器体系。这家公司认为:“防卫的经济合理性”正从根本上被重新定义。在这样的背景下,“以低成本手段应对低成本威胁”的理念正逐渐成为新的前提。

基于上述背景,在记者会上,这家公司介绍了当日发布的两项内容:对乌克兰拦截无人机企业“惊人无人机公司”的战略投资,以及拦截无人机“Terra A1”的正式发售。

美国稀土公司计划与法国基础建设基金共同投资里昂初创公司开发稀土

一美国集团和法国基金计划投资里昂初创公司开发稀土- RFI - 法国国际广播电台 

美国稀土公司计划与法国基础建设基金共同投资里昂初创公司开发稀土

 
美国稀土公司计划与法国基础建设基金共同投资卡宏寇特(Carester)开发公司,在法国波城附近建设一座稀土金属和合金工厂,应对中国在该领域的主导地位。

Largest REE Deposits in North America ... 法国基础建设基金今天在新闻稿中表示,计划与美国关键矿产公司投资总部位于里昂的初创公司卡宏寇特12.5%的股份,属于法国政府牵头的一项更广泛计划的一部分。

该计划的目标是在法国南部比利牛斯-大西洋省拉克盆地打造欧洲最全面的稀土工业生态系统。

USA Rare Earth French Partnership Transforms Supply Chains要完成本次交易仍需满足多项条件,包括完成调查审计以及最终文件的谈判和签署。根据协议双方将各自收购卡宏寇特约12.5%的股份,美国稀土公司已经于1月底确认将在法国拉克盆地建立一座稀土金属和合金生产厂。

法国该大区称此举为“重大”,该项目投资超过1.1亿欧元,并将创造约80个直接就业岗位。卡宏寇特方面预计,该项目最终每年将回收2000吨磁铁并提炼5000吨矿物精矿,该项目计划于2026年底投产。

USA Rare Earth Bolsters Integrated Value Chain with French Government  Support自卡宏寇特工业项目启动以来,法国政府已通过各种支持机制,如法国复兴计划、法国2030计划、绿色产业税收抵免投入1.06亿欧元,日本政府和私营企业已承诺向该工厂投资。

该项目被誉为“欧洲首个大型稀土回收设施,也是西方最大精炼重稀土生产商”,应对中国在该领域的主导地位,对此本政府对此次融资表示欢迎。

法国和欧盟不接受在霍尔木兹海峡征收过路费

 伊朗宣告霍爾木茲海峽主權新規向過境油輪徵收200萬美元通行費

法国和欧盟不接受在霍尔木兹海峡征收过路费

 在霍尔木兹海峡重新开放问题上伊朗提出以收取过路费作为停火条件。专家警告,此举不仅可能违反“航行自由”的国际海洋法原则,还可能树立危险先例,例如为限制台湾海峡通行提供借口。

 收取“过路费”将违反“和平航行自由”

然而在该海峡收取费用将违反国际海上贸易的一项基本且长期存在的原则:和平航行自由。这一原则历史悠久,并已被纳入《联合国海洋法公约》(UNCLOS),该公约于1994年生效。

尽管已有172个国家批准该公约,但伊朗和美国都不在其中。

根据该公约,对外国船舶不得仅以其通过领海为理由而征收任何费用,但可以对通过其领海的船只的特定服务收取服务费用,但不应有歧视。

但这与苏伊士运河或巴拿马运河收取费用不同,后者并非天然形成的海峡。

全球约20%的石油运输经过霍尔木兹海峡。如果同意伊朗收取通行费,将巩固其对该海峡的控制,并令伊朗从中获利。

美国总统特朗普已将重开海峡列为优先事项。不过白宫周三(4月8日)表示,他反对收取通行费,分析人士称海湾地区产油国也持同样立场。

分析人士还表示,尽管白宫声称情况有所变化,但自停火宣布以来,他们并未看到海峡的交通流量发生任何变化。

伊朗已开始对过往船只收费

美以发动战争后,伊朗立即通过对船只发动攻击或发出威胁袭击封锁海峡,使通行变得极其危险,从而施加影响力。

这一干扰导致高度依赖该地区能源的部分亚洲国家立即出现能源短缺,也推高了美国和欧洲的汽油价格,并威胁到全球经济增长。

随后,伊朗开始对过往船只进行检查,这一不透明机制被航运分析人士称为“收费站模式”。

船只被告知要避开伊朗和阿曼领海内的霍尔木兹海峡中部,改道绕行伊朗的拉拉克岛。

在向伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队的中间人提供船员和货物的详细信息后,一些船只被允许继续航行。据报道,至少有两艘船支付了约合200万美元的人民币费用。

英国国际与比较法研究所高级研究员康斯坦蒂诺斯·亚卢里迪斯(Constantinos Yiallourides)表示,阿曼和伊朗可能面临遵守该公约的外交阻力。

他说:“自由通行符合所有人的利益。”“我们都希望以最好的价格获得最优质的商品。”

允许收费将树立危险先例

据一位不愿具名、直接参与谈判的地区官员透露,伊朗提出的10点停战方案中,包括允许其与阿曼对通过霍尔木兹海峡的船只收费的条款。该官员表示,伊朗将把所得资金用于重建。

但《海洋法公约》第17条保障“不具威胁性的船只”享有“无害通过权”。专家指出,如果允许伊朗和阿曼对通行收费,将树立危险的先例。

巴黎索邦大学海事法专家菲利普·德勒贝克(Philippe Delebecque)表示,航行自由一直是世界海洋的一项基本权利,其基础是“海洋不属于任何国家”的理念。

他说:“航行自由始终受到承认,尤其是在海峡中。”并警告称,如果霍尔木兹海峡可以被关闭,那么地中海与大西洋之间的直布罗陀海峡,或印尼附近的马六甲海峡,为什么不能被关闭呢?

他将这种局面称为“国际社会的终结”。

法国海事法协会负责人朱利安·雷诺(Julien Raynaut)表示:“未批准该公约并不意味着伊朗在霍尔木兹海峡拥有完全的行动自由。”

“它仍然受到国际法,尤其是这一习惯性通行权的约束。”

雷诺还指出,如果伊朗设立“收费站”,中国可能会据此认为自己也可以限制台湾海峡的通行。

全球经济亟需海峡重新开放

重新开放海峡将有助于缓解自2月28日战争爆发以来对全球经济造成的供应紧张,供应限制已推高能源和化肥价格大幅上涨。

一些经济学家表示,从纯经济角度看,在霍尔木兹海峡收取通行费带来的额外成本,全球市场未必会明显感受到。

例如,一艘载有200万桶石油的大型油轮若被收取200万美元费用,相当于每桶增加1美元成本。

布鲁塞尔智库布鲁盖尔研究所(Bruegel)指出:“负担不会落在全球消费者身上,而主要由通过该海峡运输石油的海湾国家承担。”

该研究所表示,海峡一旦重新开放,全球经济将立即受益。20%的全球石油将重新回到市场,从而降低油价。

此外,油价下降还将削弱俄罗斯因油价上涨而获得的数十亿美元地缘政治收益。尽管仍受制裁,俄罗斯的石油需求量突然激增。

战前国际油价约为每桶72美元;3月31日一度升至118美元;周一,国际基准布伦特原油价格为94.55美元,在两周停火消息公布后大幅回落。

通行费流向伊斯兰革命卫队

作为海湾最大产油国,沙特阿拉伯欢迎美伊停火协议,但强调应“在没有任何限制的情况下”保持霍尔木兹海峡开放。

由于缺乏可替代通道,海湾国家不得不关闭约每日1200万桶的原油产能。目前绕过该海峡的两条输油管道规模有限,无法弥补损失,而新建管道则需要数年时间。

布鲁盖尔认为,在“收费站”方案存在诸多弊端的情况下,海湾国家只有在其他选择更糟时才可能接受这一方案。

西方的一个主要担忧是,伊朗收取的费用很可能流入伊斯兰革命卫队。

该组织负责伊朗的弹道导弹项目,镇压国内政治反对派,并被美国和欧盟列为恐怖组织。