Summary
Were
London a city-state, it would have the 20th-largest national economy in
the world – larger than the national economies of Saudi Arabia,
Argentina and South Africa. Were London a city-state, its national per
capita gross domestic product would be greater than that of the United
States. Were London a city-state, it would be the 15th most populous
country in Europe, with an overall population bigger than that of
Austria or Denmark and bigger than the combined populations of Scotland
and Northern Ireland. And were London a city-state, it would have voted
to remain in the European Union, and it would no doubt be criticizing
neighboring England for voting to leave.
Alas,
London is not a city-state, and for all its history, wealth and power,
it can never aspire to be one. For just under a millennium, London has
been the capital of England; for more than three centuries, it has been
the capital of the United Kingdom; for more than a century, it was the
capital of the largest empire ever conquered. London embodies the
paradox of all great cities. Great cities are the ultimate expressions
of their national cultures, often serving as the seat of power for
millions, even billions, of people who do not actually live there. But
just as often, the interests of the cities diverge from those of the
rest of the nation.
Such
is the case for London, a city that is the very definition of
cosmopolitan. The power it wields and the opportunities it offers have
attracted people from all over the world. The city, once a tactical
nicety for warring tribes, has become a strategic necessity for the
country in which it resides. The role London plays in that strategy
changes according to the necessities of the times, and it’s just as
likely as not that its interests actually align with the United
Kingdom’s.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.