2 Face Malaysia - Iran Parks Oil Off Malaysia To Dodge Western Sanctions
LABUAN, Sept 13 — Iran is using a little-known port off the east
Malaysia coast to hide millions of barrels of oil from Western
sanctions, according to shipping data, industry sources and
officials.
A Reuters examination of shipping movements and interviews shows
how Iranian crude is shipped to the area and loaded on to empty
vessels at night to await potential Asian buyers.
Storing the oil on hired tankers operating under the Panamanian
flag in the calm waters off the tax-haven port of Labuan — an
offshore financial centre about the size of Manhattan — means Iran
can keep its own fleet active and ensure the flow of oil money
into its struggling economy.
File
photo of Financial Park on Labuan. Iran is using the
little-known port to hide millions of barrels of oil from
Western sanctions, according to shipping data, industry sources
and officials. — Reuters pic
At least two large oil tankers have been unloaded this way in
recent weeks and several more Iranian vessels were steaming
towards Asia, according to Reuters Freight Fundamentals, which
tracks the movement of the global tanker fleet. One was destined
for a Chinese port, while three others, carrying as much as six
million barrels of crude or fuel oil, were sailing to unknown
destinations.
Iran would like to shift more oil to what is effectively a mobile
storage depot off Malaysia’s coast over the next few months, said
an industry source familiar with Iran’s planning who didn’t want
to be identified due to the sensitivity of the matter. But it is
struggling to find shipowners willing to offer vessels for
storage.
While not illegal, the dead-of-night transfer of oil in the South
China Sea illustrates the lengths to which Iran will go to keep
exporting its oil to skirt Western sanctions aimed at pressuring
Tehran’s suspected pursuit of nuclear weapons. A European Union
oil embargo has virtually halted access around the world to
insurance for Iranian crude and oil products.
Doing business with Iran’s oil industry carries reputational and
financial risk and the threat of losing insurance coverage.
NO-MAN’S LAND
Less than 10km from the coast of Borneo, Labuan is sheltered from
typhoons and is typically used to park unwanted ships rather than
store expensive oil. People in the industry say this makes it an
ideal place to blend or rebrand oil as non-Iranian and resell it
under the radar of sanctions enforcers in Washington or Brussels.
“Labuan is like a no-man’s land. There’s no reason to be paying
attention to Labuan,” said a Singapore-based source familiar with
floating storage operations in Southeast Asia.
The insurer of one of the storage ships that took oil from an
Iranian tanker said it had been informed of the transfer by the
British government on August 16, and was looking into the matter.
With fewer customers, Iran has cut its oil output and almost
halved exports from around two million barrels per day last year.
The Labuan scheme means Iran can use its own tankers to move,
rather than store, its oil. In April, shipping sources said more
than half of Iran’s tanker fleet was anchored in the Gulf just
holding some 33 million barrels of oil — worth around US$3 billion
(RM9.3 billion) at today’s prices.
Malaysian and Iranian officials did not respond to requests for
comment for this article.
China, India, Japan and South Korea, which together buy over half
of OPEC member Iran’s crude exports, have all imported less this
year, winning waivers from US sanctions. Those waivers are up for
renewal later this year, so buyers are careful not to be seen to
be increasing imports from Iran again.
DEAD OF NIGHT
Last month, the Lantana, a tanker operated by the National Iranian
Tanker Co (NITC), transferred its cargo of around one million
barrels of crude oil to the Titan Ruchira, a floating storage
vessel, off the tiny tropical island of Pulau Kuraman near Labuan,
port and shipping industry officials said. Around August 10,
another Iranian tanker, the Motion, discharged as much as two
million barrels of fuel oil on to the Titan Tulshyan in the same
area, said the officials.
The two ships are among 58 Iranian-owned vessels blacklisted by
Washington in July for assisting in Iran’s oil trade. Those
measures bar US companies and Americans from doing business with
the ships.
“Our vessels are there and, as we understand it, there are no
issues,” a source familiar with NITC tanker chartering told
Reuters.
A third NITC tanker, the Justice, had been heading for Labuan, but
shipping data shows it changed course and should arrive at the
Chinese port of Dalian on September 17. Another tanker, the
Pioneer, had been expected in Labuan early this month, but has
anchored off the southwest Malaysian coast.
“That (Lantana) operation took place literally in the dark of
night. They didn’t even use a proper operator with experience to
carry out the STS (ship-to-ship transfer),” said an east
Malaysian-based shipping source. “The authorities were aware only
after the fact.”
Iran declined to sell the stored crude to a Chinese trader who
offered US$54 a barrel — only around half the price of Iran’s
cheapest heavy crudes — said a source familiar with those
discussions.
COMPLEX WEB
The two Titan vessels are owned by offshore companies linked to
Singapore-based Tulshyan Group, which hired them out in 2010 to
Hong Kong-based Titan Petrochemicals under a five-year bare boat
charter — an arrangement where Tulshyan has no staff managing or
operating the vessel. Tulshyan, which shares a Singapore office
with Titan, said it was not aware that the cargo on its ships was
Iranian.
Titan, battling a shipping industry downturn caused by a glut of
tankers, high bunker fuel prices and a shaky global economy, has
struggled to meet charter payments to Tulshyan, according to a
person familiar with the matter. Heavy with debt and with five
straight years of losses, Titan is being sold to Chinese oil
trader Guangdong Zhenrong Energy Co Ltd, whose parent, Zhuhai
Zhenrong, is blacklisted by the United States as the biggest
supplier of refined petroleum products to Iran.
Titan hired out the two tankers to Glammarine, a little-known
shipping company that only recently registered in Labuan.
Glammarine took the two ships under a six-month charter, with
Titan’s crews running the vessels’ day-to-day operations and
Glammarine taking responsibility for finding the cargo and paying
for use of the ships.
“This was the first business we’ve done with Glammarine ... there
were no red flags raised (about them),” Titan director Augustine
Cheong told Reuters in Singapore. “The due diligence we took was
to check if they are legally incorporated. And it’s on a time
charter, so we have our own crew on board and can see if they’re
doing something wrong.” Cheong said Titan would drop the charter
to Glammarine if the oil was found to be Iranian.
Glammarine officials declined to comment. A visit to a listed
Labuan address for Glammarine given in business registry documents
found a rundown building in a neighbourhood once used to house
workers at a now defunct milk factory. The premises were closed.
PAPER TRAIL
Glammarine agreed to let a company called Account International
Safe Oil use the Titan Ruchira and Titan Tulshyan to store four
million barrels of Iranian oil, shipping sources said. Account
International is not registered in Malaysia or Hong Kong, and
Reuters was unable to find an address for the company or contact
staff for comment. Buyers of Iranian oil in China, India and Japan
said they had not heard of the company.
A Middle East industry source familiar with the company said
Account International was an affiliate of the National Iranian Oil
Company (NIOC). A second source based in east Malaysia said the
firm had business links to HK Intertrade, a Hong Kong-based firm
sanctioned by the United States in July for operating as a front
company for Iran.
“HK Intertrade purchases oil from NIOC and resells it to companies
like Account,” another southeast Asia-based shipping industry
source said.
The ships’ managers from Titan were not aware that the crude and
fuel oil transferred from the Lantana and Motion were from Iran,
Cheong said. “We requested BL (bill of lading) documents. We were
told the cargo was from India ... and we believed they were
ex-NITC tankers,” he added. “We only operate the ships as the ship
manager. We don’t own the cargo.”
A source familiar with the operations of the Titan Ruchira said
the cargo was declared as Iranian to port officials in nearby
Sabah. Customs officials in Sabah did not respond to Reuters
emails. But in signed shipping documents seen by Reuters, Account
International listed the one million barrels of crude oil unloaded
by the Lantana as Indian.
India, though, doesn’t allow the export of domestically produced
crude. Nor did the Lantana call in at India on its journey to
Malaysia that began at Iran’s crude export hub at Kharg Island,
according to Reuters Freight Fundamentals and industry sources in
both India and the Middle East.
Account International also indicated on shipping documents seen by
Reuters that the fuel oil on the Motion was from Fujairah, a major
transhipment and storage hub in the United Arab Emirates. Shipping
data shows the Motion did stop in Fujairah, but began its trip in
Iran.
INSURANCE RISK
The Titan Ruchira is insured by the North of England P&I
Association, which said it was looking into the matter after being
informed of the transfer off Labuan by London last month.
Western insurers underwrite around 90 per cent of the world’s
tanker fleet, and are currently barred from covering ships
carrying Iranian oil.
“There is a risk ... a vessel providing storage services for
Iranian oil would breach European sanctions laws,” said Mike
Salthouse, director with North Insurance Management, which acts as
manager for the North of England P&I Association. “I say a
risk because sanctions as currently drafted appear to target the
insurance of the transportation of Iranian oil and not the
provision of insurance to facilities storing such products.”
The insurer declined further comment on its investigations.
The Titan Tulsyhan is among some 7,000 vessels covered by Gard,
the world’s second-largest marine insurer.
“Gard takes very seriously any suggestion that it is in breach of
any international sanctions and is conducting an investigation,”
it said in a response to Reuters queries. “Gard can, and will,
withdraw any insurance cover if it believes sanctions are being
breached.”
Rakesh Tulshyan, head of the Tulshyan Group that owns the two
Titan vessels, said that if there is “concrete evidence that it’s
Iranian oil”, he will seek to have it removed from his vessels.
“Because of my reputation, I would rather not do any business with
links to sanctioned countries,” he told Reuters. — Reuters
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.